User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/5.1.189/26.1319; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 240X400 LG VN271SCH-U820
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGVN271SCH Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.1.189close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.1Presto Brew LGVN271SCHsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.1.189close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.1.189closeBREW LGVN271SCHcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.1.189close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.1.189Presto 2.8.119 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.8.119Brew SamsungRealitymobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:20 | by ThaDafinser