User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.2; zh-cn; MTS-SP101 Build/HuaweiC8511; 240*320) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1/UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiMTS-SP101 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.121 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 2.2HuaweiC8511smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeAndroid 2.2.2HuaweiMTS-SP101closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94WebKit 528.5Android 2.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9Webkit 528.5Android 2.2.2MTSMtag 3.1 SP 101mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:20 | by ThaDafinser