User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; zh-CN; DOOV_D300 Build/MocorDroid2.3.5) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.8.3.278 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DOOVD300 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.8WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.069 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 8.8.3.278closeAndroid 2.3.5GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.8WebKit MocorDroid 2.3DoovD300smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.8.3closeAndroid 2.3.5DOOVD300closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.8.3.278WebKit 534.31Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.8Webkit 534.31Android 2.3.5DOOV_D300mobile:smartyescloseclose0.15802 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:20 | by ThaDafinser