User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini2.7 (NokiaE62-1/0618.06.17)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaE62-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser Mini2.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser Mini2.7close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian NokiaE62-1smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 0618.06.17)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 2.7close NokiaE62-1closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia E62-1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser Mini 2.7 Series60 NokiaE62mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:19 | by ThaDafinser