User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; xx; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-netscape.yaml
Netscape 6.2.3 Gecko 0.9.4 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 6.0Tasman MacPPC AppleMacintoshDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 6.2.3closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Netscape 6.2Gecko Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 6.2.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 6.2.3close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 6.2.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.12001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 6.2.3Gecko 20020508Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 6.2.3Gecko 0.9.4MacOS desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:19 | by ThaDafinser