User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) coc_coc_browser/49.0 Chrome/43.0.2357.126_coc_coc Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-687.php
Coc Coc Browser 49.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Coc Coc Browser 49.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.068 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.126closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.126closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Coc Coc 49.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.126_coc_coccloseWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2357closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.126.coc.coccloseWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.126WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 43Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.126closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.069 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:19 | by ThaDafinser