User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; it-IT; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008092313 Ubuntu/9.25 (jaunty) Firefox/3.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 3.8Ubuntu 9.25Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.117 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.8Gecko Ubuntu 9.25desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.8closeUbuntu 9.25closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.18202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.8Gecko 2008092313Linux 9.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45605 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.8Gecko 1.9.0Ubuntu 9.25desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.8closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:19 | by ThaDafinser