User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dragon/45.6.11.385 Chrome/45.0.2454.93 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
Dragon 45.6WinVista 6.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 45.6Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.114 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 45.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 45.0.2454closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.09801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.93WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Comodo Dragon 45.6Blink Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:19 | by ThaDafinser