User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5628i/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/1.5 Nextreaming SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5628i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S5628i 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 1.5close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 1.5WebKit SamsungGT-S5628ismartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 1.5close SamsungGT-S5628icloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 1.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 1.5 SamsungGT-S5628imobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:18 | by ThaDafinser