User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; xx; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-netscape.yaml
Netscape 7.02 Gecko 1.0.2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 7.0Tasman MacPPC AppleMacintoshDesktop0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 7.02closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 7.02close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 7.2close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 7.02close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 7.2Gecko 20030208Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 7.02Gecko 1.0.2MacOS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:18 | by ThaDafinser