User agent detail

OneBrowser/4.2.0/Adr(Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; En-us; I-mobile I-style Q3i Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, Like Gecko) Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
imobileI-style Q3i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
OneBrowser 4.2WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OneBrowser 4.2.0closeAndroid 4.0.4i-Mobilei-Style Q3imobile-browseryescloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ONE Browser 4.2WebKit Android 4.0i-mobilei-Style Q3ismartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4imobileI-style Q3icloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.12401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OneBrowser 4.2.0WebKit 533.1Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OneBrowser 4.2.0Webkit 533.1Android 4.0.4i-Mobilei-Style Q3imobile:smartyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.053 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:16 | by ThaDafinser