User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 Nokia5230-1b/10.2.071; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series60.yaml
Series60 5.0Webkit 413Nokia5230mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.078 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4Nokia5230mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0Nokia5230-1bsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 10.2.071;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4Nokia5230-1bcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 5.0closeSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5230-1bcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 5.0Nokia5230mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.4Nokia5230Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:16 | by ThaDafinser