User agent detail

KWC-M2000/AAN0314 UP.Browser/7.2.7.2.528 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
KyoceraM2000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 Mobile Phoneyes0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
KWC-M2000 AAN0314closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.528close KyoceraM2000/AAN0314mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 KyoceraM2000smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.2.7close KyoceraM2000closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.528 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.2 KyoceraM2000mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close KyoceraM2000/AAN0314Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:15 | by ThaDafinser