User agent detail

Qype/Android/v4.7.6-hdpi (Model/HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio;SDK/15;Lang/de_DE)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCSensation XE with Beats Audio Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Qype Androidcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.7.6HTCSensation XEmobile-browseryescloseclose0.33403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCSensation XEsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid HTCSensation XE with Beats Audiocloseclosecloseclose0.02 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.7.6HTCSensation XEmobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.057 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:15 | by ThaDafinser