User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 5.0.2; zh-cn; NX513J Build/LRX22G) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/5.3 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
QQ Browser 5.3Android 5.0.2WebKit ZTENubia My Praguesmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 5.0.2GenericAndroid 5.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.3WebKit Android 5.0ZTENubia My Praguesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.3closeAndroid 5.0.2NX513Jcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.3WebKit 534.30Android 5.0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.3Webkit 534.30Android 5.0.2ZTENubia My Praguemobile:smartyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 34closeAndroid 5.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:15 | by ThaDafinser