User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:2.0) Treco/20110515 Fireweb Navigator/2.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Fireweb Navigator 2.4Windows XP desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Fireweb Navigator 2.4closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Fireweb Navigator 2.4 Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 2.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Fireweb Navigator 2.4closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 2.4 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:15 | by ThaDafinser