User agent detail

SonyEricssonU5a/R1CA; Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/525
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonU5a Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.0NetFront SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4SonyEricssonU5amobile-browseryescloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0Sony EricssonVivazfeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4SonyEricssonU5acloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia BrowsercloseSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 525Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson U5acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 525Series60 5.0Sony EricssonVivazmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonU5aFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:14 | by ThaDafinser