User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; InettvBrowser/2.2(00014A;SonyDTV115;0002;0100) KDL-60R520A; CC/AUS) Presto/2.12.362 Version/12.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4 Presto 2.12.362SonyBravia R520 Smart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12Linux Smartphone OS Linux DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.11Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDL-60R520Atv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.11closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.15602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2Presto 2.12.362Linux Sony KDL- Digital TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.362 SonyBravia R520 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:14 | by ThaDafinser