User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Pt-br; lg-gx200) UCBrowser8.2.0.132/69/352/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGgx200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 LGgx200smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0close LGgx200closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.132 LGLGgx200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko LGgx200mobile:featureyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:13 | by ThaDafinser