User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2; En-us; T-Mobile HTC_G2 Build/FRF91) Gecko/20110415 Firefox/4.0.2pre Fennec/4.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
TmobileHTC_G2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Fennec 4.0Gecko 2.0Android Mobile Phoneyes0.072 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 4.0.2precloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox closeAndroid 2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.33203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Fennec 4.0Gecko Android 2.2HTCG2smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 4.0.2precloseAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 4.0.1closeAndroid 2.2TmobileHTC_G2closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Fennec 4.0.1closeAndroid 2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Fennec 4.0.1Gecko 20110415Android 2.2HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile Fennec 4.0.1Gecko Android 2.2HTCG2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.12701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox Mobile 10.0closeLinux MozillaSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:13 | by ThaDafinser