User agent detail

Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/1.1.3003/hifi/tmobile-motorola/at; Motorola V3i; en; U; ssr)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Mini 1.1 MotorolaV3imobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 1.1Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 1.1.3003closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 1.1Presto MotorolaV3ismartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 1.1.3003close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 1.1.3003close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 1.1.3003close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 1.1.3003 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 1.1 MotorolaV3imobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 1.1close MotorolaRAZR V3Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:12 | by ThaDafinser