User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; xx; KFAPWI Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.13 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/tablet/os-fireos.yaml
Silk 3.13FireOS 3Webkit 535.19AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9"tabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.13WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9Tabletyesyes0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.25202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.13Blink Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9" WiFitabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.13closeAndroid AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9" WiFicloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.13WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.13Webkit 535.19FireOS 3AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9"tabletyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.1closeAndroid AmazonKFAPWITabletyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:11 | by ThaDafinser