User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; Q700i Build/XOLOQ700i) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.64462
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
XoloQ700i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.071 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 4.2.1XoloQ700imobile-browseryescloseclose0.26203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.2XoloQ700ismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212closeAndroid 4.2.1XoloQ700icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1212.64462WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.2.1LavaXOLO Q700imobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16closeAndroid 4.2XoloQ700iSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.073 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:11 | by ThaDafinser