User agent detail

ERO247 Android Application (16, ero247 v2.2.2) - TCT ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 991T TCT - FFFFFFFF-EF1A-BDD0-FFFF-FFFF99CFD235
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ALCATELONE TOUCH 991T Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ERO247 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android AlcatelONE TOUCH 991T TCT - FFFFFFFF-EF1A-BDD0-FFFF-FFFF99CFD235smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid ALCATELONE TOUCH 991Tcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.16902 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.065 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:11 | by ThaDafinser