User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; de; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071129 PmWFx/2.0.0.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.0.0.11OS/2 Warp 4.5Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.074 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.8.1.11closeOS/2 desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
OS/2 desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.11closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.11Gecko 20071129OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.0.0.11Gecko 1.8.1OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:10 | by ThaDafinser