User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/540.0 (KHTML,like Gecko) Chrome/9.1.0.0 Safari/540.01438211984723
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Dragon 9.1Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 9.1WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 9.1.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 9.1.0.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 9.1WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 9.1.0.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 9.1.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 9.1.0.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.22902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 9.1.0.0WebKit 540.0Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 9.1.0.0Webkit 540.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 9.1.0.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 9.1.0.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:09 | by ThaDafinser