User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; IBrowse 3.0; AmigaOS4.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
IBrowse 3.0AmigaOS 4.0 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.061 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.28703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IBrowse 3.0 AmigaOS 4.0desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
IBrowse 3.0closeAmigaOS 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
IBrowse 3.0 AmigaOS 4.0desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:08 | by ThaDafinser