User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.2; Win64; x64) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
Opera 12.16Win8 6.22.12 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.16closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.16Presto Windows 8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.16closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.16closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.16closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12.388Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46605 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12.388Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:07 | by ThaDafinser