User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; Series60/5.0 NokiaN97-5/30.2.004; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/525
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series60.yaml
Series60 5.0Webkit 533.4NokiaN97 Minimobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.147 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 525closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4NokiaN97 minimobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0NokiaN97smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 30.2.004;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4NokiaN97-5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 closeSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.13601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 533.4NokiaOS NokiaNokia N97-5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533.4Series60 5.0NokiaN97 Minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.4NokiaN97 miniFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:07 | by ThaDafinser