User agent detail

YahooMobile/1.0 (im; 1.8.3.13903); (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; htc_bliss Build/GINGERBREAD_MR1);
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCbliss Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
YahooMobile 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCRhymemobile-browseryescloseclose0.30103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCblisssmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.5closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCblisscloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yahoo Messenger 1.8.3 Android 2.3.5HTCRhymemobile:smartyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.052 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:07 | by ThaDafinser