User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; A1-810 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.117 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 37.0Android 4.4unknown AcerIconia A1-810Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.4AcerIconia A1-810Tabletyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.4AcerIconia Atabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 37.0.2062closeAndroid 4.4.2AcerA1-810closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.117WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 37Blink Android 4.4.2AcerIconia A1-810tabletyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.4AcerIconia Tab A1-810Tabletyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:07 | by ThaDafinser