User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 Firefox/3.6.23
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-033.php
Firefox 3.6MacOSX 10.51.9.2 AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.23closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.23closeOS X 10.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Mac 10.5desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.23closeOS X 10.5closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.23closeMac OS X 10.5closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.23closeOS X 10.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.23Gecko 20110920Mac OS X 10.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.23Gecko 1.9.2Mac OS X 10.5desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.23closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:06 | by ThaDafinser