User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux x86_64) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Opera 12.16Linux unknown2.12 2.12.388unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.16closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.16Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.16closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.16closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.16closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12.388Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.16Presto 2.12.388Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:06 | by ThaDafinser