User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.20 Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1147.18 (Edition Next)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Opera Next 15.0.1147.18Windows 8Blink desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 15.0Blink Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1147.18closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 15.0.1147.18closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.23902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 15.0Blink Windows 8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1147.18closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 15.0.1147closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.20closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.15701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 15.0.1147.18WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.38404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 15.0Blink Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1147.18closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 15.0.1147.18closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:05 | by ThaDafinser