User agent detail

T-Mobile Vairy Touch II/5.0 Obigo/Q03C Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Obigo Q03C T-MobileVairy Touch IIsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
T-Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM ZTET-Mobile Vairy Touch IImobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q03C T-MobileVairy Touch IIsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q03C Browser Q03C Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3C T-MobileVairy Touch IImobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q03Cclose ZTET-Mobile Vairy Touch IIFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.096 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:05 | by ThaDafinser