User agent detail

Mozilla/5 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML like Gecko) Arch Linux Firefox/23.0 Xfce
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 23.0Arch Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 23.0Gecko Arch Linux desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 23.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 23.0closeArch Linux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 23.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 23.0WebKit 537.4Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.38004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 23.0Webkit 537.4Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 23.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:05 | by ThaDafinser