User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Photon; U; QNX x86pc; xx; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/-0000001 BonEcho/2.0.0.20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.20QNX Gecko 1.8.1mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.093 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (BonEcho) 2.0.0.20closeQNX desktop-browsercloseclose0.23702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox BonEcho (2.0Gecko BlackBerry Tablet OS yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Bon Echo 2.0.0close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
BonEcho 2.0.0.20closeQNX closecloseclosecloseclose0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.20Gecko closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.20Gecko 1.8.1QNX mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:05 | by ThaDafinser