User agent detail

Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows 98)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-ie.yaml
Internet Explorer 4.0Windows 98 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 2.0Gecko Desktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.0closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 4.0Trident Windows 98desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.0closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 4.0closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.032 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 4.0closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.10701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 4.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 4.0 Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:04 | by ThaDafinser