User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 2.3.5; en-US; AMAZE S250) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.2.3.324 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCAMAZE S250 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U2 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux MicromaxA54mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2 Android 2.3yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.3closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCAMAZE S250closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.16202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.3.324 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Gecko Android 2.3.5AMAZE S250mobile:smartyescloseclose0.07801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:04 | by ThaDafinser