User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dragon/43.3.3.176 Chrome/43.0.2357.81 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-705.php
Dragon 43.3Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 43.3Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.20402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 43.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2357closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.81WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Comodo Dragon 43.3Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:04 | by ThaDafinser