User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20130331 Firefox/21.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Firefox 21.0Ubuntu Gecko 21.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 21.0Gecko 21.0Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.058 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 21.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 21.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 21.0Gecko Ubuntu desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 21.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 21.0closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 21.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 21.0Gecko 20130331Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51605 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 21.0Gecko 21.0Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 21.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 21.0closeMac OS X 10.7Desktopcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:04 | by ThaDafinser