User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (+PVR;Humax;iCord Cable;1.01.09;1.0)CE-HTML/1.0 ANTGalio/3.1.1.23.04.09
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
ANTGalio 3.1.1.23.04.09 HumaxiCord Cabletv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HbbTV 1.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
ANT Galio 3.1.1.23.04.09close media-playercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ANTGalio 3.1 HumaxiCord Cabletv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close HumaxiCord Cablecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ANT Galio 3.1.1 HumaxiCord Cable Digital Receivertelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:03 | by ThaDafinser