User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.118 Safari/537.36; 360 Aphone Browser (2.0.1beta)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-360.yaml
Qihoo 360 Browser 2.0.1Android Blink 537.36mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.118closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.118closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
360 Phone Browser 2.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.118closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.118closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.118WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qihoo 360 Browser 2.0.1Blink Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.118closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:02 | by ThaDafinser