User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; ru-ru; PATG7506HD Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/537.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Android 4.0Android 4.1unknown Perfeo7506-HDTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Perfeo7506-HDTabletyesyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1PATG7506HDcloseclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 537.16Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 537.16Android 4.1.1Perfeo7506 HDtabletyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:02 | by ThaDafinser