User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; AT503 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, Like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.92 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 30.0.1599.92Android 4.2.1Blink ToshibaRegza AT503tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.224 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeAndroid 4.2.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.26203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.2ToshibaRegza AT503tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.2.1ToshibaAT503closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.92WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Android 4.2.1ToshibaRegza AT503tabletyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:02 | by ThaDafinser