User agent detail

SIE-A50/00 UP.Browser/5.0.2.3.100
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SiemensA50 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0 Mobile Phoneyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SIE-A50 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0.2.3.100close SiemensA50mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0 SiemensA50smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 5.0.2close SiemensA50closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.0.2.3.100 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 5.0 SiemensA50mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SiemensA50Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:02 | by ThaDafinser