User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; C2 Build/JOP40D YunOS/2.1.0-E20130710.1324) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.77.34.5 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-aliyun.yaml
Aliyun Browser Aliyun OS 2.1.0Webkit 537.36ZopoZP960 C2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 19.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 19.77.34.5closeAndroid 4.2.1ZOPOC2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 19.77WebKit YunOs 2.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 19.77.34closeAndroid 4.2.1ZopoC2closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 19.77.34.5WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Aliyun Browser Webkit 537.36Aliyun OS 2.1.0ZopoZP960 C2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.07901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 19.77.34.5closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 19closeAndroid 4.2ZOPOC2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.274 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:02 | by ThaDafinser