User agent detail

HTC_Mega Opera / 9.5 (Microsoft Windows ; PPC Opera Mobi /17753 ; U; es-ES)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCMega Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Mobicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile closeWindows HTCMegamobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows HTCMega Operasmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile closeWindows HTCMegacloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile Windows Mobile HTCTouch 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile close HTCMegaFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:02 | by ThaDafinser