User agent detail

KWC-M1400/AAR1004 UP.Browser/7.2.7.2.531 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
KyoceraM1400 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 Mobile Phoneyes0.106 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
KWC-M1400 AAR1004closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.531close KyoceraM1400mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 KyoceraM1400smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.2.7close KyoceraM1400closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.531 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.2 KyoceraM1400mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close KyoceraM1400Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.082 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:01 | by ThaDafinser