User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009102815 Iceweasel/3.0.6 (Debian-3.0.6-3)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Iceweasel 3.0.6Debian 3.0.6Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iceweasel 3.0Gecko 1.9.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IceWeasel 3.0.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iceweasel 3.0Gecko Debian 3.0desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Iceweasel 3.0.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iceweasel 3.0.6closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iceweasel 3.0.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.13101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iceweasel 3.0.6Gecko 2009102815Linux 3.0.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iceweasel 3.0.6Gecko 1.9.0Debian desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:01 | by ThaDafinser